search

Google
 

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

France Badly Discredited by Obedience to US


Tehran dismissed the recent statements made by the French defense minister about Iran's nuclear activities, saying that such meaningless remarks which bear no value undermine France's international status


"The simple-minded obedience to the US statesmen in recent months has and will deal a heavy blow at France's credit and reputation," Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Seyed Mohammad Ali Hosseini said here on Tuesday following the remarks made a day earlier by Herve Morin against Iran's nuclear programs. more

US Made to Change Game after Iran's Cooperation with IAEA


Iran's foreign minister Mottaki :

cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog has made the US change the game and create another problem for the Islamic Republic as it perceives the pending solution of Tehran's nuclear issue.
"Iran's intimate and sincere cooperation with the (International Atomic Energy) Agency has pushed the US to change the settings of the game to create another problem for Iran.

Washington charges Iran of collaborating with terrorists while it is the main supporter of terrorism, reminding that the Taliban was originally created by the US to fight against the former Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
We are not happy with the killing of the US soldiers in Iraq, murder of everyone, even American soldiers, is a source of regret for Iran.The Islamic Republic has no role in the killing of the US soldiers,
The US administration is lying to the American nation to hide its failures in Iraq. "This is a measure to hide the subsequent defeats the United States has sustained due to its wrong policies in the region, specially in recent years. details

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

India-Pakistan-Iran Pipeline Project , Will it work ?

The India-Pakistan-Iran pipeline project is facing serious hurdles including pricing and fierce opposition of the U.S. government for some times. For India, Iran, world’s second largest oil and gas proven reserves, is a big market and an important access route to Central Asia and Afghanistan.

According to some political experts, the IPI project will be proved as the mother of all confidence-building measures between these two neighboring countries. They have even called the IPI project as the ‘Peace Pipeline’

The U.S. concerns over the IPI project is not linked to the economic side of the deal but to Washington’s Iran policy. The US has had not good relations with Iran since the 1979 revolution. In past some years, the US administration has been accusing Iran for carrying nuclear-weapon ambitions.

India has come under greater pressure because of the development of bilateral relations with US. The Indo-US nuclear deal, which gives India’s nuclear capability a legitimacy, the first one outside the Non-Proliferation Treaty, may force India to come out of the Iran pipeline deal.

The IPI is being perceived as running against this broad strategic American perspective where India is being emerged as an ally to counter China’s rising power and Iran regional importance.

However, the fact of the matter is that regional pipelines actually contribute to the sustainable growth and stability of the linked regions. The IPI project will do the same for the three countries involved in the project for sure. more

On Track for U.S Collapse

by Michael S. Rozeff - Oct 29, 2007
Bush and Cheney are steering the U.S. into a collapse. Only strong public voices by influential people can prevent the coming disaster. We desperately need for men and women who are known to the public and have credibility to speak up in the critical period ahead to avoid catastrophe.

A few weeks ago, Israel bombed a alleged nuclear facility in Syria. This is a warm-up for an attack on Iran.

In the last few days, the U.S. unilaterally tightened sanctions on Iran. Russia and China do not support this move.

A week ago Bush warned Iran that its attainment of nuclear arms would lead to World War III.

Russia, which has been assisting Iran in its nuclear construction program for decades, regards Western military action against Iran as unacceptable.

China has been arming Iran with missiles. Its relations with Iran have been improving for years.

We know that Bush and Cheney are capable of pre-emptive attack. We know that Bush will act if he believes he is right no matter what the costs are. In his distorted worldview, Iran with nuclear weapons is a scenario worth any cost to avoid.

We know that Bush, Cheney, and Rice have repeatedly warned Iran of meaningful consequences if Iran arms itself with nuclear weapons. We know that their terms in office end in 15 months. These are the critical months.

But it is by no means clear that the front-running candidates for office who may replace them hold substantially different views. Hillary Clinton has publicly called for sanctions against Iran and has called Iran a threat to Israel.

Why may an unprovoked attack on Iran lead to WWIII and why may it lead to the collapse of the U.S.?

Imagine this scenario. The U.S. encourages Israel to bomb the Natanz nuclear facility in Iran. Russia attempts to restrain an Iranian response but fails. Iran responds in any of many ways, such as launching missiles on Israel, firing on shipping in the Straits of Hormuz, mining the Straits of Hormuz, sending troops into Iraq, or allying its military with Hezbollah and attacking Israel from Lebanon.

The U.S., citing Iran’s aggressions (that will be the story), launches a full-scale attack on Iran designed to devastate the country. This attack has actually been planned by the U.S. for years. Syria is unable to maintain neutrality and quickly becomes a battleground between Iran and Israel.

The price of oil by this point has already soared to $200 a barrel. The U.S. begins to use its strategic reserve and to divert Iraqi production. Russia responds by taking steps to prevent its oil production from reaching the U.S. China responds by cutting off its support of the U.S. Treasury market. Venezuela halts oil shipments to the U.S. The first stages of WWIII are economic warfare designed to cripple the U.S. and halt its war-making capacity.

The U.S., unable to finance its deficits and fund its sovereign debt, is forced into raising interest rates drastically in order to borrow. The Fed is forced to print money. An inflationary spiral occurs. Meanwhile the high interest rates and high oil prices, not to mention the shock of a spreading conflict, drive the U.S. economy into severe decline. The U.S. attempts to raise taxes in order to fund itself, further crippling the economy. Gold soars to $1,500–$2,000 an ounce.

The U.S. attempts to bolster its military forces. The draft is reinstated. The severity of the emergency allows Bush and Cheney to assume emergency powers and begin a dictatorship. Elections are postponed.
The U.S. collapses.
Unfortunately, even if this scenario does not occur, the position of the U.S. is so precarious that any number of other scenarios equally disastrous lie in wait. This house needs urgently to be put in order or it will fall, and especially if it does not terminate its imperial adventures. The very fact that Bush and Cheney (or any major U.S. political officials) gain by starting WWIII is a terrible indictment of our entire political system.

Who can stop this? Who can prevent this? It will only take a few well-placed people to prevent this catastrophe. My guess is 5–20 people could sway public opinion against war or provide enough cover for Congressional dissenters to screw up their courage. Maybe even as few as 3 or 4 influential people could derail the Bush-Cheney train to disaster. They need to speak out at the right times and they must be heard. Previously mute or muted voices simply must speak out. They know who they are. They know that their silence will mean silent approval of a U.S. collapse. by Michael S. Rozeff - Oct 29, 2007

ElBaradei urges full transparency from Iran

Oct 29 - The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Monday Iran's agreement on a plan to resolve questions about its nuclear program was important but "active cooperation and transparency" would be key to its success.
In a speech to the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said it was regrettable that Iran had not suspended uranium enrichment and was continuing to build a heavy water reactor at Arak, contrary to Security Council decisions.
He said Iran had recently provided additional information and access to resolve "a number of outstanding issues, such as the scope and nature of past plutonium experiments." "While the agency so far has been unable to verify certain important aspects relevant to the scope and nature of Iran's nuclear program, Iran and the secretariat (of the IAEA) agreed in August on a work plan for resolving all outstanding verification issues," ElBaradei said.
He said those issues were at the core of lack of international confidence about Iran's program. Washington and other Western countries suspect Tehran is developing nuclear weapons, a charge that Iran has denied.
ElBaradei said Iran's agreement on a work plan with a defined timeline for addressing the various issues was "an important step in the right direction." "Naturally, Iran's active cooperation and transparency are key in this regard," he said. He said that if the IAEA was able to provide "credible assurance" that Iran's nuclear work was peaceful, it would help build international confidence and "create the conditions for a comprehensive and durable solution." ElBaradei has said Iran was years away from having the ability to produce a nuclear weapons and that there was still no evidence Tehran was building a bomb
source

Globalists attempting to depopulate the world

Leuren Moret is an American independent scientist and international expert on radiation and public health issues.
She has devoted her life to awakening the public to the destructive consequences of the depleted uranium munitions used by the U.S. military and has made relentless efforts to stop the United States from destroying the environment. Following is the text of a Press TV interview with Leuren Moret published on October 25:

Q: The U.S. is using DU weapons in violation of international treaties. Why is the international community not forcing the U.S. to stop the use and production of such weaponry? A: I’ve asked that question many times myself. With the demonstrated total and complete failure of international judicial remedies more

Sanctions against Iran Indicative of US Paralysis


Mahmoud Mohammadi A prominent Iranian MP :


The Unite States' one-sided sanctions against the Islamic Republic reveal that Washington has come to a state of paralysis.

Adoption of such measures by Washington is nothing new.The United States has sought to impose different sanctions on the Islamic Republic for years, And the fact that the United States has made continued efforts all throughout the past years to impose various sanctions on Iran indicates the US's paralysis and the Islamic Republic's invulnerability to these sanctions."

Monday, October 29, 2007

chicago people Anti war movment: STOP THE WAR





American propaganda

Where have I heard that tune before










KAL's cartoon

Iran says the US backing terrorists


Saeed Jalili, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator:


Iran has access to information that would show that the US is backing terrorist in Iraq.


Escalation of terrorism in the region is one of the direct results of the presence of occupiers in Iraq, particularly America," and that there was "...information available proving America's support for terrorist groups in the region,"more

Sunday, October 28, 2007

DEJA VU? NO EVIDENCE IRAN IS BUILDING NUKES.

Chief UN atomic watchdog Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding “fuel to the fire” with recent bellicose rhetoric.

“Even if Iran were to be working on a nuclear weapon … they are at least a few years from having such a weapon [..] at this stage we need to continue to work through creative diplomacy … as I don’t see any other solution than diplomacy and inspections.”

The White House rejects the idea that “Iran rhetoric” is similar to our build up prior to invading Iraq.

The world is rightly concerned that the United States might pick another fight in the middle eastread more

US WAR ON IRAN : Closer to Reality

By Gregor Peter Schmitz and Cordula Meyer in Washington
Washington society has been chattering about the risk of war with Tehran. It's an open secret that Vice President Dick Cheney has made bombing plans, but even high-ranking military experts think an attack would lead to world economic chaos, or even what George W. Bush calls 'World War III.

US Vice President Dick Cheney -- the power behind the throne, the eminence grise, the man with the (very) occasional grandfatherly smile -- is notorious for his propensity for secretiveness and behind-the-scenes manipulation. He's capable of anything, say friends as well as enemies. Given this reputation, it's no big surprise that Cheney has already asked for a backroom analysis of how a war with Iran might begin.
In the scenario concocted by Cheney's strategists, Washington's first step would be to convince Israel to fire missiles at Iran's uranium enrichment plant in Natanz. Tehran would retaliate with its own strike, providing the US with an excuse to attack military targets and nuclear facilities in Iran.

Shirin Ebadi: Iranians will Respond to Aggressors

The Iranian Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi warned West, specially France, against invasion of Iran, stressing that in case of an enemy attack, the Iranian people will give a proper response to the aggressors
Ebadi : You must encourage Mr. Sarkozi to give more thought to France's national interests. France's national interests are not attained through a war with Iran or any other country. We are opposed to the military confrontation with Iran.
I hereby, announce on behalf of the Iranian people that if Iran comes under attack, our nation will respond to it."

Elsewhere, the Noble Peace Prize Winner welcomed a complaint lodged by four human rights organizations in France against former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and said, "I remember quite well the day when (former Iraqi dictator) Saddam Hussein targeted our country with his chemical weapons and Mr. Rumsfeld went to Iraq and stressed the Untied States' support for him during his meeting with Saddam." The four human rights organizations have sued Rumsfeld on charges of torturing Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib prisoners and issuing orders for torturing conducts.

German FM Warns against Military Action against Iran

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Saturday warned against any "military adventures" against Iran over its nuclear programs.
: Military adventures are no contribution to a solution .The daily ranting about it only makes a solution more difficult.
Germany will continue to work toward a diplomatic solution along with the United States, Russia and China more.

Iran says ME tensions will propel oil price to $120


TEHRAN (PIN) –

Vice chairman of the Energy Committee of Majlis (Iran’s parliament) predicted that oil price would rise to 120 dollars if tensions in the Middle East continued


Tensions between regional countries like Iraq and Turkey mounted and led to the outbreak of a war, oil price would reach 120 dollars. more

Iran urges US to find strategy to resolve its regional problems

Mottaki recommended the United States to find a strategy for resolving its problems in the region.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki :
Sanctions will not resolve US problems. Americans (officials) should respect Iran's rights and the Islamic Iran asks for nothing other than its rights." "Condemning an official institution of a country's military forces at the parliament of another country against international laws and regulations will not be supported by international community.

"If you develop a wrong approach, this wrong approach can be repeated in other places.



There are two approaches for dealing with issues, "One is to have interaction and the other to confront." "We have chosen the first option which is supported by the international community. Therefore, we advise Americans (officials) to avoid further isolating themselves .


irna

iran or bust



Cagle cartoon


Stop Fearmongering About Iran : Bill Maher

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Iranian missiles no threats to any countries

Iran Defense Minister Brigadier General Mostafa Mohammad NajjarIranian :

Iranian missiles are no threats to any states and would only pound those who violate the country's boundaries, and Iran's missile power would only be used to serve regional peace and security.

Iran's missile power "is part of the Islamic world's defense power."


The US president had lately claimed that Iranian missiles could target US and Europe by 2015.
Those rhetorics were only aimed at "justifying the US plans to make a missile shield in the Republic of Czech, a plan which is increasingly opposed by European public opinion,"

Friday, October 26, 2007

Cheney after seizure of Middle East oil wealth

The former commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps of Iran (IRGC) :

Over 65% of the world's oil reserves are concentrated in the Middle East and one of the major objectives of the US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan was to seize this region's oil wealth which will skyrocket to dlrs 200 a barrel by another escalation."

US has militarized the region to prepare the ground for huge arms sales, adding, "As it was made public in recent news editions, the US has signed arms deals with regional countries, including Saudi Arabian Kuwait, and the UAE worth sixty billion dollars." read more


ad

Blog Archive