In classical strategy, there are nine specific strategic situations in classical strategy. Each of them demands a very specific response. In the ultimate situation, called the do-or-die situation, the only response is to fight with everything you have. This brings us to the problem of Iran.
click to solve the puzzle
Is preventing a nuclear Iran a do-or-die situation? I think most independent Americans recognize that it is. This creates a serious political problem for both parties. If Bush takes any visible action before the end of his term (and sooner is always better in terms of strategy), the war with Iran becomes Bush’s war, like Iraq, and the Republicans lose the next election. However, if Bush refuses to act, the Democrats are forced to take a position on Iran, and, with their large anti-war base, are put in a no-win situation, where they have to choose between subtantial percentage of their base or the majority of independents. This is why both Hillary and Armadinejad would like to goad Bush into taking action before the next election. Interesting situation, isn’t it? source
click to solve the puzzleIs preventing a nuclear Iran a do-or-die situation? I think most independent Americans recognize that it is. This creates a serious political problem for both parties. If Bush takes any visible action before the end of his term (and sooner is always better in terms of strategy), the war with Iran becomes Bush’s war, like Iraq, and the Republicans lose the next election. However, if Bush refuses to act, the Democrats are forced to take a position on Iran, and, with their large anti-war base, are put in a no-win situation, where they have to choose between subtantial percentage of their base or the majority of independents. This is why both Hillary and Armadinejad would like to goad Bush into taking action before the next election. Interesting situation, isn’t it? source
No comments:
Post a Comment